Goodall 1

"There was no fairy godmother waving a magic wand--only his shear determination to make his childish vision into reality."

The story told about Paul Rockich and his restoration of the Oquirrh Mountains show that it is possible to fix what we have destroyed. It will be difficult, but it isn't impossible. Though stories like this are still few and far between. I hope that some day, the human race (specifically, republicans) will realize how important efforts like Paul's are to restore Earth's natural beauty.

"This discussion about healing earth's scars illustrates that, through  combination of human determination, scientific know-how, and the resilience of nature, even badly compromised habitats can be restored..."

About 65 million years ago, on a March day, somewhere in what is now Mexico, a big rock landed on the ground, releasing energy 2 million times greater than the most powerful nuclear bomb. This created a huge cloud of ash, which, within a 24-hour period, killed virtually all megafauna on the planet. If one were to have witnessed this event, it's safe to assume that they would think no life could ever return to this planet. It's irradiated the animals, poisoned the atmosphere, and completely changed the course of history. But, as we know, the world did not lose its ability to harbor life, and after a few million years, megafauna have returned. I don't think that anything we do to this planet will cause a complete irradiation of life, but if we want to still exist, we should probably try to not make the problem any worse.

http://www.radiolab.org/story/dinopocalypse/ Go here. Listen to this. So awesome.

"Without all the other men and women who are working so hard to conserve and protect our plants and their environments, our planet would be a poorer place."

And that's what this class is trying to do, isn't it? Create more environmentalists to fix the problems that we've all had a hand in causing? Let's hope it's as effective as the creators of Colloquium intended.

Carson

"Only within the moment of time represented by the present century has this one species--man--acquired significant power to alter the nature of his world."
 Sometimes I wonder, if there really was a god, which I don't think there is, if god were asleep since the dawn of man, and came to earth, to see all of what we have created, would god be horrified? Would god be ashamed? Proud? Progress is an interesting concept that man has created. We change the natural world for the sake of progress. Progress...toward what? What is the ultimate goal here? Does all progress require deforestation? Does all progress require species irradiation? Does all progress require skyscrapers, satellites, & overpasses? What would god think of a prairie or forrest turned into a highway? Hm.

"The figure is staggering and its implications are not easily grasped--500 new chemicals to which the bodies of men and animals are required somehow to adapt each year, chemicals totally outside the limits of biology experience."

I understand what Carson is saying here, but I don't like the way she uses 'chemicals.' Environmentalists frequently use the 'chemical' in a derogatory manner, when chemicals are literally everything. Every single thing in the known universe is a chemical compound. Some chemicals are man-made, or are only found in certain areas and get introduced into other areas. This may be good or it may be bad. But you can't simply make the claim that "chemical"=bad.

"I do contend that we have put poisonous and biologically patent chemicals indiscriminately into the hands of persons largely or wholly ignorant of their potentials for harm."

Here here. I completely agree with this statement, and contend that we continue to do so, just not as blatantly has we once did. Companies still dump hazardous waste into the environment since it's cheaper than disposing of it properly. Some people do this as well, usually out of ignorance, as opposed to maliciousness. Then again, I'm an environmental engineer, and waste-site remediation is a big part of Environmental Engineering, so if people stopped poisoning the land, air, and water, I'd be out of a job....



All I can think about as I'm doing this is...

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1541306/thumbs/o-WALKING-DEAD-POSTER-570.jpg?6

Do I get points off for the picture being off topic?

Shiva

“throughout the 20th century it was considered that substitutes could be found for resources supplied by biodiversity: renewable source of us of energy-would an animal energy-could be replaced by fossil fuels; manure for growing food could be replaced by the products of fertilizer factories; and medicines could be made from synthetic molecules. But fossil fuels have given us climate change; agrochemicals have threatened species, undermined soil fertility, and human health; and synthetic drugs have had a fatal side effects.”

Wow. There’s so much wrong with this paragraph it’s hard to know where to start.

Climate change is a big problem, yes, but it’s hard to look at the industrial revolution and say that it was such a terrible thing because climate change. Maybe I’ll be swallowing my words when FGCU is 15 ft under water, but until then…
As an environmental engineering student, I have learned that the reason chemical fertilizers (which has given us the ability to feed enough people to lead to 7,000,000,000 of us, you’re welcome) cause so much environmental issues is because of misuse, and overuse. The gun is not dangerous unless in the wrong hands.
And the worst thing of all…fatal side effects from modern medicine? Are you freaking kidding me?? You know what would be worse than the occasional fatality from a synthetic drug? Polio! Smallpox! Cancer! This author is so incredibly ungrateful to what the 20th and 21st century has given her.


“Our ignorance of the ecological functions of diverse forms of life is no excuse for us to push species to extinction, or to manipulate them without concern for the ecological impact.”
I am very torn with this statement. On one hand, I am an environmentalist, and am horrified at the way man has irradiated species for the “greater good” and for the “cost of doing business.” However, as an engineer, I've seen first hand what genetic engineering can do. Are there risks? Yes. But science should never ever be limited because of potential risks. Algenol Biofuels is using genetically engineered algae to create gasoline and other types of oil through sustainable practices. Do I feel bad about the algae? No.

“The imperative to destroy diversity in order to increase productivity comes from my one-dimensional monocultural paradigm which fails to take the diverse functions of diverse species into account.”
This is something that I CAN support. And it brings to mind the millions of acres of corn that are grown in this country. Corn has ended up in virtually every processed food stuff that you can find in your grocery store. Yet the ignorance of the masses prevents anyone but select outsiders (more commonly known as “damn liberals”) to question and fight against this mono-culturing.

http://www.aei-ideas.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/11.16.12-Corn-Field.jpg

Overall, I give this segment of the book a C+. It's interesting, gives a lot of good facts, but is overall very one-sided and bias (like the rest of the book). And I'm an environmentalist, so that should tell you something.

Diamond

"How could a society that was once so mighty end up collapsing?"

The author alludes to the idea the the modern society that we find ourselves in can also suffer from grand collapses that has plagued mankind for tens of thousands of years.  Man is notorious for its strong reactive approaches, compared to its meager preventative approaches. We have been on the brink of utter collapse in the past. In the start of the 1900s, there was a beginning of a food crisis, where there wasn't enough Nitrogen in the soils to feed the ever increasing population. But in around 1911, Fritz Haber discovered a way to create ammonia from nitrogen in the air, and badabing, badaboom, you get 7+ billion humans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Haber

We were almost all wiped out during the cold war between the US and Russia. The 2 nations had created enough nuclear warheads to irradiate life on the planet about a dozen times over. Fortunately our intellect prevented our destruction.

"Perhaps we can still learn from the past, but only if we think carefully about its lessons."

We need to take this statement to heart in order to succeed as a planet. This is the information age, where the average person who has access to a computer connected to the internet can learn more in a week than the most intelligent people knew back 1,000 years ago. [citation needed]

I believe that our future is bright. I do not think that our modern society will suffer a cataclysmic collapse that will lead to an eradication of the population. Even with the threat of climate change, I think that our prestigious intellect will allow us to weasel our way out of inadvertent doom. 

"Many people fear that ecocide has now come to overshadow nuclear war and emerging diseases as a threat to global civilization."

http://mmazroui.kau.edu.sa/ImageGallery.aspx?Site_ID=0003580&LNG=EN&Gal=450

Planet-wide human annihilation through planetary phenomena (excluding a large meteor or comet hitting the earth) is, I believe, very improbable. Do I think that humans are causing global climate change? Yes. Do I think we can do something about it? Yes. But  even in the worst-case-scenario, I think humans will progress. The dark ages are the most recent historical example of a decrease in average human intelligence and life-expectancy.[citation needed] But in a world of decreased religious upbringings, and a population capable of witnessing world events as they occur from anywhere, another dark age seems improbable. And if the the worst happens, and widespread famine occurs, and there are droughts and floods plaguing the world, someone will engineer a way out of it, just like Fritz Haber did. 

So I'm not scared of the future. I'm stoked!

Plan B, Chapters 1-3

I don't like this book. It was published in 2009. All of the cited journals and articles are from no earlier than 2009, but some of them are as old as 2004. In the world of science & technology, that's a huge gap. It's 2014. This book is 5 years old and is far too out of date to be giving viable information to students, and I encourage this book be replaced with something more up-to-date as soon as possible.


But back to the quotes...

"Business as usual is no longer a viable option. Food security will deteriorate further unless leading countries collectively mobilize to stabilize population, stabilize climate, stabilize aquifers, conserve soils, protect cropland, and restrict the use of grain to produce fuels for cars"

Grain should not be used for fuel. The yield of fuel produced from corn is extremely low. Algenol, a local business, can produce over 10X the yield with algae to produce ethanol. Technology like that of Algenol is what will cure us of our addiction to fossil fuels.

"While desert expansion and water shortages are now displacing millions of people, rising seas promise to displace far greater numbers in the future, given the concentration of the world's population in low-lying coastal cities and rice-growing river deltas. The numbers could eventually reach the hundreds of millions, offering they another powerful reason for stabilizing both climate and population."

If we don't do something about the amount of CO2 we're dumping into the atmosphere, then we, floridians, will be in serious trouble. Ft. Myers is only 10 ft. above sea level. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that the rate of sea level rise for the 3000 years before the industrial revolution averaged only between 0.1 and 0.2 mm/yr, while the rate has increased to 1.8 ± 0.5 mm/yr when averaged from 1961 to 2003. Increasing CO2 emissions will make seas rise even faster, leading to devastation of seaside property.


"With energy, our goal is to close all coal-fired power plants by 2020, replacing them largely with wind farms. In the Plan B economy the transportation system will be electrified with a broad-based shift to plug-in hybrids, all-electric cars, and high-speed intercity rail. And in the Plan B world, cities are designed for people, not for cars."

Cities designed for people, not for cars. Let's have a thought experiment, shall we? A majority of cars run on gasoline. Gasoline comes from oil drilled from the ground. The oil drilled from the ground is owned by the oil companies. The oil companies donate billions of dollars to republicans running for political office in the US. Therefore, the republicans, in order to keep the support of big oil, want to keep them happy, therefore, the republicans build cities designed for cars instead of people, and that's how Tampa, and other republican-run cities were born.

A land remembered

Rather than selecting quotes from this story, choose a character from the book. Briefly describe who the character is and their role in the novel. How does the character relate to their environment and the natural world? What is the character’s sense of place and legacy? How do you relate to this character? What is your sense of place and how does this relate to the character? What is your legacy and how does it relate to the character? Compare and contrast.

Zech MacIvey

Zech MacIvey is the son of Tobias MacIvey, and father of Solomon MacIvey. He was raised by his father in the Hammock of Southern Florida. Zech only talked to 2 females in this book, excluding his mother, and slept with both of them. He helped his father, Tobias, with the maintaining of the "MacIvey Cattle Company" by assisting in the capturing, branding, and transporting of swamp cows from the areas around their home to Punta Rassa. Zech relates to his environment similar to that of the seminoles, who he shares not only similar ideals, but also a son. 

I think Zech MacIvey failed his father and failed as a father by the way he raised his son, Solomon. The cause of this failure could become a masters-degree dissertation in and of itself. I'd say its a combination of his affair with Tawanda, his reaction to Solomon's selling of birds to stupid rich people, and the death of his wife, Glenda. 

When Glenda, Zech, and Solomon were traveling, they ended up in a city that had a shop that sold exotic birds. Solomon found the shop fascinating, and got an idea. He asked for some money from his father, bought some empty cages from the bird shop, and a few hours later, was found by his father selling small birds to the locals. Solomon told the locals that the birds were "kookabens," and "they'll turn green and red when they grow up." Zech knew and told his son that the birds were really baby buzzards. But instead of scolding his son for being dishonest and ordering that he stops the scam and refunds the money to the townsfolk, he brushes it off as good fun, and later lies to his wife about it when Sol exclaims that he wants to use the money he made to buy land. 

Zech traveled to the Seminole village after being shot in the foot, hoping that their medicine man can heal him better than the doctor in Punta Rasa. Instead of making this a learning experience for his son, that the modern world doesn't necessarily have all of the answers and that some things can be accomplished through more uncommon methods used by the Seminoles, he tells the boy he's raised since birth that he has a brother, and that his father cheated on his mother with a Seminole woman. Although the boys do become friends, I believe that its Zech’s drive for maintaining and expanding their farm and vast wealth that prevents the two boys from learning from one-another, specifically Solomon learning from Toby, Zech's bastard son. Zech makes Sol promise to never tell his mother about Toby, which makes Sol question the trustworthiness of his father, and the lessons that Zech tries to bestow on him. 

When Glenda died, Zech told his son Solomon that he shouldn't worry about women, since they'll eventually die and you, the man, will be crushed. "Sol, don't ever get yourself tied up with a woman. It's like owning dogs. You get to liking them, and it hurts powerful when they go away. And they all go away. If you get to lovin' a woman too much, it'll bring pain and sorrow when she leaves you. It's done hurt me twice, and the pain of it is pure awful. It'll never go away. Don't let it happen to you."

What is wrong with this series of statements? This is what I think ultimately causes the complete failure of Zech's fatherhood, and the cause of Sol's spiral from the nature-loving steward of the environment like his father, toward the money-grubbing destroyer of natural beauty that he becomes. In this lesson, Zech encourages his son to forget seeking a mate, since their eventual death overshadows all happiness that can come out of the relationship. This idea is appalling on so many levels. The biggest one is that Zech is saying this, about his wife, to his son, meaning that if he, Zech, were to have taken the advice that he was currently bestowing to his son, then his son, ironically, wouldn't have existed in the first place! This implies that Zech thinks his love, marriage, and all that came of the relationship, including their son Zech, was a mistake. Horrible. 

Not only that, but Sol takes his father's advice, which makes him shift any focus he may have had, or would have had, away from  seeking a mate. This makes Zech become a workaholic. This, along with the lack of lessons on natural stewardship, and the importance of sharing the natural world with all that his father never seemed to get around to endowing him with, and with the land that he bought through the scamming of innocent people, Solomon completely shifts away from what the past 2 generations of MacIvey have acted, and becomes a rapist of the natural world. He cares more about money than anything else, betraying his father's legacy. Zech failed to teach his son the importance of the greater good, like when he saw all of the animals, predator and prey, seek refuge at a water hole during a drought.

Sol realized his failure when he visited his family home to find that it was torn down, replaced with orange groves. Donovan, the man who was hired to take care of the grove, exclaimed that Sol should be happy of his actions. It would mean more money for the company. His blindness and lust for money was the cause of the destruction of his family home. Ironically he realized that he did the exact same thing to the custard apple forests to plant vegetables, which led to Toby hating the actions and yelling at Sol.

Even after seeing this irony, he still sold all of his undeveloped land as lots. He then mirrored his “kookabens” scam by selling the land at huge inflated prices, only to buy them back with the same money after the prices plummeted due to a destructive hurricane. 

Zeck MacIvey created the monster that created the MacIvey Empire. That is his legacy. 

I relate to this character very little. I am educated, was born in a wealthy family, and have spent more of my life inside than out. I may have never seen the things that Zeck MacIvey has seen, but I appreciate how he tried to save the land before its ultimate destruction, even though he failed to explain the importance of preservation to his son. 

My legacy is still unfinished, but if my intuition and predictions serve me correctly, I will become a world-famous environmental engineer who solved the climate crisis with a yet-unknown form of clean energy that sequesters carbon greater than anything currently known. I will then run for US senate, and push forth sweeping legislation to tax carbon emitters and create a more natural and healthy world. I will be sure to impart in my children the importance of working with nature, and how not to destroy it, unlike Zech. 

Grunwald

"When our distant descendants move into the Fourth Millennium, I hope it will be remembered that this generation, at the beginning of the Third Millennium, put aside partisanship, narrow self-interest and short-term thinking by saving the Everglades."

Almost every day I think about that idea. Humans have come so far over the last 1,000 years. We've fought plagues, droughts, floods, nature, and each other, yet we are still here. We haven't blown ourselves up with the Hydrogen Bomb. We haven't starved out despite surpassing 7 billion of us existing all at once. We've accomplished a whole lot. Yet we still have so far to go. The amount of nonsense, illogic, short-citedness, hypocrisy, and otherwise stupidity that goes on among the decision makers of this nation makes me think that we won't see the 4th millennium. I'm not sure, and I suppose it doesn't really matter. I won't be around to find out, so the best thing I can do is try to push society in the direction of potential existence in the 4th century.

http://www.condenaststore.com/-sp/Yes-the-planet-got-destroyed-But-for-a-beautiful-moment-in-time-we-created-a-lot-of-value-for-sh-Prints_i9318014_.htm

But when it comes to the everglades, I do have hope. Everglades restoration is happening. $4 million is going toward restoration, in order to turn back the clock to before humans decided to damage it. I trust that by the time restoration has been completed, (if florida isn't already underwater from climate change) we will see a healthy everglades nearly identical to the one that existed 500 years ago. We have great potential to alter the hydrology of the planet for its benefit instead of our own. 

I have a very love-hate relationship with politics. This nonsense with Al Gore and CERP is something that makes me hate it."Unfortunately for the environmentalists, every other key stakeholder wanted the opposite. Sugar growers, home builders, water utilities, and Florida’s other economic interests were all determined to make sure CERP did not favor nature over people…" The idea of destroying the natural beauty of the everglades, something that exists no where else on the planet, for the sake of sugar cane, and houses just sickens me. And the idea that this nonsense could have lead to the election of George W. Bush by having Gore lose Florida makes me want to pull my hair out. 

Fortunately the airport didn't happen, and the Everglades lives to fight another day. I think the environmental movement both in florida and nationally is large enough to handle any potential future attacks against the everglades without nearly as much trouble. "As the new millennium dawned, the Everglades was not yet saved. But it was not yet doomed either." I trust that the everglades will not be doomed for quite some time. The nation is slowly but surely opening its eyes to the importance of environmental stewardship & sustainability.